NHeLP submits this brief to provide the Court with relevant background information regarding the Medicaid program and to correct several misstatements the Intervenors made in prior briefing in this case. The medical risk of coerced childbearing is ificant: the U. Here in Pennsylvania, anti-abortion lawmakers have obsessively promoted unconstitutional abortion restrictions while allowing the maternal mortality rate to double since Like everywhere else, maternal and infant mortality rates are much higher for Black women and infants than their white counterparts.
Amici curiae are advocates for reproductive justice including New Voices for Reproductive Justice and 24 additional Pennsylvania-based and national organizations advocating for Black women and girls. National Health Law Program brief:.
Skills Posted on May 7, Search for:. Earlier this year, the state and a small group of legislators have asked the court to dismiss the case because of a precedent.
Cohen; Planned Parenthood Federation of America; and the private law firm Troutman Pepper LLP, a group of Pennsylvania abortion providers filed a lawsuit challenging the state statute that bans abortion coverage through the Pennsylvania Medicaid program. That is not the case. Department of Human Services Medicaid Case current-litigation.
Amici submit this brief in support of petitioners to amplify the importance of reproductive justice, the human right to control our bodies, sexuality, gender, work, reproduction, and ability to form our families. Opinion June 21, Petition for Review January 16, January 17, PennLive : Groups go to court over Pa.
Now, Providers are Suing.
Its central claims are that the abortion coverage ban violates the Equal Rights Amendment and equal protection provisions of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Department of Public Welfare to be overruled.
Petitioners also assert that striking down a state law as unconstitutional would not, as House Intervenor-Respondents also contend, relieve the General Assembly and all other state actors from complying with federal law because the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution compels such compliance. Amici Curiae filed May 15, Reproductive Justice Brief: Amici curiae are advocates for reproductive justice including New Voices for Reproductive Justice and 24 additional Pennsylvania-based and national organizations advocating for Black women and girls.
It does so on the basis of their sex and on the basis of their choice to exercise their fundamental right to terminate their pregnancy. January 16, U. January Law Pa. Ban on Abortion Funds. Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. Amici have an interest in this case because the questions before this Court involve issues of separation of powers between the three branches of State government and the constitutional interpretation of a state statute restricting low-income women from obtaining health care services.
The case, Allegheny Reproductive Health Center v. National Health Law Program brief: Amicus curiae the National Health Law Program NHeLP is a year-old public interest organization that works to advance access to quality health care, including the full range of reproductive health care services, and protect the legal rights of low-income and underserved individuals.
Specifically, they have attempted to force married women to notify their husbands before having an abortion, criminalize abortion at arbitrary points during pregnancy, and ban the safest and most common second-trimester abortion method by threatening to jail doctors. Research shows denying women access to abortion also causes ificant psychological and socioeconomic harm. Reproductive Justice Brief:.
Amicus curiae the National Health Law Program NHeLP is a year-old public interest organization that works to advance access to quality health care, including the full range of reproductive health care services, and protect the legal rights of low-income and underserved individuals.
Research shows one in four women seeking abortion care who cannot overcome the lack of Medicaid funding will be forced into carrying her pregnancy to term and giving birth against her will. Specifically, petitioners seek a court order requiring the Pennsylvania Department of Human Services to comply with the state Constitution by covering abortion through Medicaid, a court order declaring that abortion is a fundamental right under the Pennsylvania Constitution, and for the Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision in Fischer v.
Under current state law, Medicaid can cover abortion only if the pregnancy is caused by rape or incest, or the abortion is necessary to avert the death of the pregnant woman. For example, Intervenors suggest that if Pennsylvania is forced to cover abortion services, it could choose to terminate coverage of family planning services and supplies to save money.
January 16, Philadelphia Inquirer: Pennsylvania faces new lawsuit over ban on Medicaid coverage of abortion. Petitioners outline why the lone precedential ruling upholding the ban was wrongly decided and should be overruled. Pennsylvania Religious Coalition for Reproductive Justice brief:.
Highlander 3 locations
Amici argue that any genuine efforts to protect the health and well-being of pregnant women must allow for those seeking abortions to have access to safe and affordable abortion care. If Pennsylvania were to terminate or substantially reduce coverage of family planning services, it would violate the Medicaid Act, putting all of its Medicaid funding at risk.
Omnibus Brief. In this brief, amici argue that the state-enforced Medicaid ban on covering abortion care has consequences for all Medicaid beneficiaries in Pennsylvania, but those consequences fall more heavily on Black women and girls.